Adoriasoft
ENGINEERS WITH A PRIMARY FOCUS ON DLT & BLOCKCHAINADORIASOFT IS A TEAM OF ENGINEERS WITH A PRIMARY FOCUS ON BLOCKCHAIN AND DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGIES.
We develop software products for startups and mid-size businesses. Building software from scratch, we always look at it through the end- user’s eyes making it as intuitive and functional as possible. Our partners can rely on Adoriasoft as our team knows perfectly and follows all the product development phases. We know how new products are entering markets, whether the goal is to pitch investors or release the MVP.
In creating software, we also follow the latest technology trends and monitor the product market to know what today’s business expectations are for hi-tech software.
WHAT ARE OUR STRENGTHS?
- We are more than just coders, our team consists of science-oriented experts with math-driven approaches
- With a considerable background in information security and cryptography, we use our knowledge and skills to create complex and secure software solutions from the ground up
- We always handle our projects with a proactive attitude thoroughly investigating the business needs of our clients and suggesting the most optimal solutions
- We adopt the team augmentation model, meaning we seamlessly integrate our IT professionals into our customers’ existing teams
- Our extensive experience in product development allows us to join the project at the earliest stages and suggest the most effective ways of its implementation. In creating software, we always start with the discovery phase and get to the very core of the product
- Our team consists of highly professional developers we cherry-picked across different regions
VeriBlock
Token.io
Save Pharmaceutical
- Mobile App Development
- Software Development
- Web Development
- App Designing (UI/UX)
- Blockchain Technology
- Testing Services
- Web Designing (UI/UX)
- Small Business(< $10M)
- Medium Business($10M - $1B)
- Large Business(> $1B)
- Banking
- Enterprise
- Financial & Payments
- Healthcare & Medical
- Information Technology
- Manufacturing
- Real Estate
- Retail
- Startups
- Media
- Telecommunication
Adoriasoft- Virtual Device Drivers Project
Working With Adoriasoft was truly pleasant. They got the requirements from our tech brief right away and produced the results we wanted in a short amount of time, at competitive prices, without significant administrative oversight on our part. The FaceRig Virtual Webcam Driver and Virtual Microphone Driver for Windows are currently being used by FaceRig on Steam.
What is it about the company that you appreciate the most?
Good Technical Expertise in kernel mode device driver writing for Windows. Work was thoroughly tested before being sent our way (very few quirks founds by us or our customers, but in general they were bug-free).
What was it about the company that you didn't like which they should do better?
Minor aspects: Communication improvements in regard to aspects such as the expiration of the digital certificates used to sign the drivers. Some driver sub modules had a bit controversial names set, though that was not a technical issue.
Professional and responsive team, high quality work and transparent pricing
What is it about the company that you appreciate the most?
Smooth communication. Very quick to understand the project. Transparent costs.
What was it about the company that you didn't like which they should do better?
We found no area that was lacking.
They have been very responsive and proactive during the dev process

My role in the company covers quite a number of fields - client consulting on multiple project-related issues, business development, and technology consulting. For many projects, I act as a sort of CTO organizing the process and advising on the most effective tools and technologies to be used.
I actively participate in the R&D processes for the projects Adoriasoft is involved in. I join the project at the initial stage researching the theoretical and scientific base that will lay the foundation for the entire product.
Another point that I would like to make here is that we always build our clients’ products as if we were their owners or founders. We work together with the client to evolve their initial idea into a complete project with all components, features, tools, and work stages laid down even before the first line of code is written. We know how to interpret the client’s product vision and business goals into specific software features and often suggest valuable improvements. In addition, our consultants and engineers can identify possible vulnerabilities in the existing client’s code or infrastructure and suggest ways to prevent them.
Generally, we can describe our work as 110% commitment with the team seeing each project in a long-term perspective.
Our clients can be best described as ongoing rather than repetitive. We prefer to become long-term partners with our clients providing a complete set of services from product support and maintenance to marketing consulting. Unfortunately, some projects do get ramped down or closed altogether for various reasons - the client going off the market, insufficient investments, the client’s internal issues. However, I can say that about 40% of our clients remain with us for long periods and become true business partners.
In a private environment, we also prefer Ethereum-compatible platforms. Here, our environment of choice is Hyperledger Besu introduced by their member, PegaSys, a spin-off from Consensys, which is becoming a true blockchain empire with strong long-term potential. We believe their technologies are going to stay with us for quite some time, this is why we prefer using them in our projects.
At the same time, we have enough experience of Hyperledger Fabric which we find effective for developing private solutions. Moreover, one of our team members is the engineer who participated in the creation of Hyperledger Iroha.
Speaking of tools and frameworks, we use web3 tools, particularly, web3.js, Truffle Suite, Node.js and React.
To answer your question, we believe that decentralized technologies bring completely new values to the current state of internet technology. They may eventually become a dominant player in this field. For example, static websites hosting on top of the decentralized IPFS protocol can effectively replace classic HTTP. Generally, there are quite a lot of decentralized equivalents of Web 2 protocols.
Of course, there are also security challenges. Many blockchain protocols contain vulnerabilities that present a risk of attacks. The reasons may be various - from code errors to insufficient decentralization. Here, we also set our hopes on VeriBlock and its unique solution of enhancing another blockchain security by using the power and decentralization of Bitcoin. In its turn, Polkadot with its shared security concept also holds a certain promise.
The main solution is in enhancing the collaboration between blockchain development teams towards achieving higher compatibility and reducing the security risks.
Speaking about ICOs, their main problem was lack of regulation. Many projects were set up just to collect money and, with no regulation, there were no mechanisms designed to protect the investors. In fact, IEOs that succeeded ICOs became a crowdfunding form that contains such regulations both before and after the IEO completion.
Another problem was the availability of advertising with no evaluation of projects by the advertising platforms. What could really make a difference at that point was community approval but that came too late. The only thing advertising platforms did was blocking all blockchain-related projects. From this point of view, ICOs did significant damage to the industry. At the moment, for blockchain R&D, it would have been better if many ICOs had never happened.
At the same time, ICOs gave the world a lot of innovative solutions advancing the entire DLT industry and having considerable value. For example, such major projects as Polkadot, Ethereum, VeriBlock, IPFS, and others became possible after token sales.
Generally, we base our project cost calculations on the complexity of the solution to be built, the requirements to the skillset, the number, and the complexity of user flows. In this context, the main factor, I believe, is not the costs as such but careful and detailed planning. We prefer planning our projects in logical increments so that we have a deliverable result at the end of each stage.
In addition, we often work according to the team augmentation model assigning our team members to the client’s team. This way, the client does not need to choose between their team and ours but, rather, has a united team under single management. We use popular collaboration tools to set up an effective team operation - Jira, Slack, other observability solutions providing various metrics, such as test coverage. With such a model, we use monthly billing.
As for ongoing projects, we apply an hourly rate that, depending on the required skill, ranges from $50 to $65.
However, we place the main focus not on the price but on the value that we bring to the client’s business sticking to a lean development process. We either build reliable, effective, and secure software solutions that are ready for marketing or we build a proof-of-concept or a prototype ready for pitching to investors, depending on the short-term goals of a client. We always try to become a complete technology partner for our clients setting up an efficient, transparent, secure, and convenient working environment.