TemaBit

TemaBit is a solution provider that solves everyday enterprise challenges such as scalability, redundancy, down timing. We provide business intelligence analytics, packaged software products as well as SW development, database development, mobile application development, UX/UI Design, QA Services. We work with body-shopping, team-shopping, project-based outsourcing approaches. We are fluent in most of the technologies.

The idea was to utilize our experience and create solutions that help businesses to operate. TemaBit has had extensive experience in mobile solutions, web solutions, we also have had deep dive in such specific fields as BPMS, assortment, price management.

Temabit can provide a solution expertise and can develop/customize/ a solution for your needs, as well as provide you development resources.

We work with body-shopping, team-shopping, project-based outsourcing.

We have obtained experience in solution design across all spectrum of business processes as well as we developed expertise in most of the technologies. We can provide you not only development services but technological and business consulting.

TemaBit is a solution provider that works across all spectrum of business processes. The most familiar for us is retail and cross retail solutions such as vendor, warehouse, data management. We are extraordinarily strong in mobile, payment, point of sale solutions.

We have more than 70% of our customer base who is our repetitive customer base.

In an ideal world, to determine the time frame we need to have a statement of the problem in the form of technical specifications or at least BRD, a list of recommended technologies, a list of limitations, a functional architecture diagram, a list of systems, and protocols for integration. Ideally, you need an app design as well.

It depends on complexity but on average, it may take between three and six months to develop an app. A typical team for a mobile application consists of three developers - back, iOS, Android. They work synchronously and are 100% occupied. In terms of resources, the front end is twice the times longer than back. 3-6 months is an average period for a mobile application of medium complexity.

You must know the answers to these questions:
What is your budget for app development? Does it reconcile with the cost?
What is your target user? What is the behaviour of that user? From here you should know the features you want to incorporate, a device it needs to support. The technology you want/require to use.

In most cases, a customer gets to us with a clear vision of what to choose.
IOS or Android. Both offer an extensive range of features. Android, however, is slightly different on devices from different manufacturers, IOS is uniform.

If the customer does not know which platform to choose, our recommendations are based on a business idea, depending on the target audience of the product. In general, we do not have a preferred platform; they are equal for development.

Hybrid or Native:
Hybrid is developed using HTML, JavaScript, and CSS. You can run it anywhere, performance suffers compering to Native, but it is cheaper and faster to develop. Native Apps are developed using platform-specific language, separate code for each platform. It has higher cost and development time, but no need to spend time after for customization, also native apps add privilege of functions that are specific to OS on which those apps are built. Speed to market, one source code, easy updates, availability of resource makes Native more attractive. But later, a company will spend more time for customization.  Native apps give advantages of functions that are specific to the operating system.  Building on Native makes more sense for long term strategy.
It is important to add here these:  Ionic (Apache Cordova), Xamarin, React Native, Flutter, Android Native (Java / Kotlin), iOS Native (Obj-C / Swift).
1. Ionic is a hybrid, I described it already (HTML / CSS / JS, it slows down, but it is quick to develop). The disadvantages include non-native display and behaviour of controls.
2. Xamarin, RN, Flutter - these are toolkits that are compiled into native code. Pros - up to 90% of cross-platform code, that is, development acceleration compared to a pure native, cons - can be a little slower than native, UX may differ from native, technologies are still developing, and are not completely stable. RN is Facebook, Xamarin is Microsoft, Flutter is Google.
3. Java / Kotlin, Obj-C / Swift - I mentioned it already.
Ionic can be offered for rapid prototyping, or for maximum cross-platform, for example, for corporate products, when only employees will use it, and a unified interface is required.
Java / Kotlin, Obj-C / Swift - for public products where UX should be as native as possible
Xamarin, RN, Flutter - where you need close to native performance, but you need to reduce the development cost.

Complexity of the solution, hours we put in.

It depends on our agreement but generally, it is post-payment after the task is delivered.

Our budget requirement starts from $8k per project. The initial project can be less if we agree on a technological forecast with a customer.

Our average rates 29/h across all technologies.

It highly depends on industry. For example, if it a loyalty system we suggest enable in-app purchase, in -app marketing, rating system, maximum involve your customer in usage of the application. To be able to monetize your app you will need to consider all key strategies, such as: In-app purchases, in app advertising, subscription, data usage. You will have to pay attention to cost-per-impressions, cost-per-click, cost per sale networks, cost per install networks, cost per view. To use or not Freemium upsell.