Azure

Azure. Invent with purpose.

(0 Reviews)
About Azure
Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the f...
read more
Azure
Azure. Invent with purpose.
0.00/5 (0 Reviews)
Product Demo
Core Features
App Development Software Features
  • Code Refactoring
  • Compatibility Testing
  • Debugging
  • Deployment Management
  • Mobile App Development
  • No-Code Development
  • Reporting & Analysis
  • Software Development
  • Source Control
  • Web App Development
  • Access Controls
  • Collaboration Tools
Discussions
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the most experienced and oldest (founded in 2006) service provider in the market. Google Cloud Platform (GCP) started its journey in 2011 and has created a significant presence in the industry. Microsoft Azure was established in February 2010 and has created a fighting ground for itself against the rivals. COMPUTE: AWS’s Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) is the primary solution that offers scalable computing on demand. GCP’s Compute Engine and Microsoft Azure’s Virtual Machine and Virtual Machine Sale Sets are viable competitors of the EC2. If the focus is deploying software containers with Docker, Google and Amazon both offer two suitable solutions, namely Container Engine and Container Registry, and EC2 Container Service (ECS) and EC2 Container Registry (ECR) respectively. Whereas, Container Service offered by Azure provides similar features but does not support methods for private Docker registries. STORAGE: AWS’s Simple Storage Service contains extensive documentation including a wide range of sample code and libraries along with numerous articles and tutorials. AWS undoubtedly tops Google’s Cloud Storage along with Azure’s Storage and Data Lake Store, since it has active discussion forums and free webinars. PRICING: Detailed analysis of the hourly on-demand pricing comparison between AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud by SIMFORM concluded the following findings. The pricing model offered by Azure for General purpose server is the lowest. As for compute optimized server, Google Cloud provides the most economical priced model. AWS delivers the cheapest price model for GPU instances and offers Memory optimized servers at a similar price as Azure, which is less than the amount charged by Google Cloud. MARKET SHARE: Azure is generally preferred by the new generation and small/medium-sized enterprises. Developers who are working on enterprise applications opt for Google Cloud. According to Synergy Research, AWS has the maximum share (33%) in the cloud infrastructure service market as of the second quarter of 2019. There are several top implementation service provider who can assist businesses in finding the right service and offer guidance in selecting the ideal service provider whether you are looking for AWS partners, Azure consulting companies, or Google Cloud platform consultant.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the most experienced and oldest (founded in 2006) service provider in the market. Google Cloud Platform (GCP) started its journey in 2011 and has created a significant presence in the industry. Microsoft Azure was established in February 2010 and has created a fighting ground for itself against the rivals. COMPUTE: AWS’s Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) is the primary solution that offers scalable computing on demand. GCP’s Compute Engine and Microsoft Azure’s Virtual Machine and Virtual Machine Sale Sets are viable competitors of the EC2. If the focus is deploying software containers with Docker, Google and Amazon both offer two suitable solutions, namely Container Engine and Container Registry, and EC2 Container Service (ECS) and EC2 Container Registry (ECR) respectively. Whereas, Container Service offered by Azure provides similar features but does not support methods for private Docker registries. STORAGE: AWS’s Simple Storage Service contains extensive documentation including a wide range of sample code and libraries along with numerous articles and tutorials. AWS undoubtedly tops Google’s Cloud Storage along with Azure’s Storage and Data Lake Store, since it has active discussion forums and free webinars. PRICING: Detailed analysis of the hourly on-demand pricing comparison between AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud by SIMFORM concluded the following findings. The pricing model offered by Azure for General purpose server is the lowest. As for compute optimized server, Google Cloud provides the most economical priced model. AWS delivers the cheapest price model for GPU instances and offers Memory optimized servers at a similar price as Azure, which is less than the amount charged by Google Cloud. MARKET SHARE: Azure is generally preferred by the new generation and small/medium-sized enterprises. Developers who are working on enterprise applications opt for Google Cloud. According to Synergy Research, AWS has the maximum share (33%) in the cloud infrastructure service market as of the second quarter of 2019. There are several top implementation service provider who can assist businesses in finding the right service and offer guidance in selecting the ideal service provider whether you are looking for AWS partners, Azure consulting companies, or Google Cloud platform consultant.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the most experienced and oldest (founded in 2006) service provider in the market.

Google Cloud Platform (GCP) started its journey in 2011 and has created a significant presence in the industry.

Microsoft Azure was established in February 2010 and has created a fighting ground for itself against the rivals.

COMPUTE:

AWS’s Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) is the primary solution that offers scalable computing on demand. GCP’s Compute Engine and Microsoft Azure’s Virtual Machine and Virtual Machine Sale Sets are viable competitors of the EC2.

If the focus is deploying software containers with Docker, Google and Amazon both offer two suitable solutions, namely Container Engine and Container Registry, and EC2 Container Service (ECS) and EC2 Container Registry (ECR) respectively. Whereas, Container Service offered by Azure provides similar features but does not support methods for private Docker registries.

STORAGE:

AWS’s Simple Storage Service contains extensive documentation including a wide range of sample code and libraries along with numerous articles and tutorials. AWS undoubtedly tops Google’s Cloud Storage along with Azure’s Storage and Data Lake Store, since it has active discussion forums and free webinars.

PRICING:

Detailed analysis of the hourly on-demand pricing comparison between AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud by SIMFORM concluded the following findings.

  • The pricing model offered by Azure for General purpose server is the lowest.
  • As for compute optimized server, Google Cloud provides the most economical priced model.
  • AWS delivers the cheapest price model for GPU instances and offers Memory optimized servers at a similar price as Azure, which is less than the amount charged by Google Cloud.
undefined

MARKET SHARE:

  • Azure is generally preferred by the new generation and small/medium-sized enterprises.
  • Developers who are working on enterprise applications opt for Google Cloud.
  • According to Synergy Research, AWS has the maximum share (33%) in the cloud infrastructure service market as of the second quarter of 2019.

There are several top implementation service provider who can assist businesses in finding the right service and offer guidance in selecting the ideal service provider whether you are looking for AWS partners, Azure consulting companies, or Google Cloud platform consultant.

Request Claim Profile
This software profile has not been claimed by anyone till now. If you belong to this software and have the authority to own this GoodFirms profile, then please claim it now.
Key Details
Software trial:

Available

Starting Price:

Free version

Check vendor pricing
Platforms:
GoodFirms