Upgrade the old. Build the new. Modernize.

Pillir is the developer of a low-code/no-code, cloud-native platform that enables organizations to develop mission-critical apps 20 times faster than traditional methods, leveraging the power of SAP’s digital core from any device, with or without connectivity. Pillir’s platform automatically converts legacy custom business processes to modern mobile-friendly applications. It enables organizations at any stage of their SAP journeys to quickly and easily innovate, with little-to-no programming requirements, rapidly moving custom development to the edge.

United States United States
3133 W. Frye Road, Suite 101, Chandler, Arizona 85226
United States United States
Phoenix, Arizona 85216
NA
50 - 249
2013

Service Focus

Focus of Implementation Services
  • ERP Consulting - 50%
  • SAP ERP Consulting - 50%

Industry Focus

  • Advertising & Marketing - 25%
  • Business Services - 25%
  • Financial & Payments - 25%
  • Information Technology - 25%

Detailed Reviews of Pillir

5.0 1 Review
  • All Services
  • Implementation Services
  • Relevance
  • Most Recent
  • Rating: high to low
  • Rating: low to high
Write a Review
Kevin Grant

Material Inventory Management business processes modernization including all business processes

Pillir provide this low-code platform that serve as an alternative to Fiori Mobile Apps, that is much more powerful and way easier to customize. Moreover they have a solution that can automatically take your ABAP code and convert it to mobile-friendly cloud-based application in no time.

What service was provided as part of the project?

Implementation Services, Robotic Process Automation, Supply Chain & Logistics

What is it about the company that you appreciate the most?

A project that was otherwise estimated in 12-16 months, took using Pillir's platform 6 week

The only solution that support offline mobile apps in conjunction with SAP

Easy to use (with free training) and a very friendly customer support

What was it about the company that you didn't like which they should do better?

I really haven't found something I don't like about this solution

Rating Breakdown

  • Quality
  • Schedule & Timing
  • Communication
  • Overall Rating